
In short. Yes, the family court can waive six months in a mutual divorce: since Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017) the cooling off period under Section 13B(2) is directory, not compulsory. This is for couples who have already settled everything and see no chance of reunion. A waiver application can be filed a week after the first motion, and if granted, the decree can follow within weeks rather than months. Next step: put the full settlement in writing and file the joint petition with the waiver application ready.
Is this your situation?
- You and your spouse have agreed to divorce and have settled alimony, custody and every pending case.
- You have been living separately for well over a year and there is no chance of getting back together.
- One of you has a job offer, visa or remarriage plan abroad and six more months of waiting causes real hardship.
- The first motion is already recorded and you want to know if the second motion can be brought forward.
- The family court refused your waiver application and you are wondering what comes next.
- Your marriage is less than a year old and you want to know whether you can file at all.
- One spouse lives outside India and cannot travel twice for the two motions.
Key points
- The six months is not compulsory. The Supreme Court held in Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017) that the period in Section 13B(2) is directory, so the family court can waive it.
- Waiver is a discretion, not a right. The court must be satisfied that the settlement is genuine, mediation has failed and waiting would only prolong the agony.
- The waiver application comes after the first motion. Amardeep Singh allows it to be filed one week after the first motion is recorded.
- Settle everything first. Courts are slow to waive where alimony, custody or criminal cases are still loose ends.
- The one-year separation can also be waived in exceptional cases. A Full Bench of the Delhi High Court confirmed in December 2025 that both periods can be waived, each on its own assessment.
- Either side can still withdraw consent before the decree. Until the second motion decree is passed, a mutual consent divorce depends on both spouses continuing to agree.
The short answer, and what the six months is for
A mutual consent divorce under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 is a two-stage process. At the first motion, husband and wife jointly tell the family court that they have been living separately for a year or more, cannot live together, and have agreed to dissolve the marriage. The second motion, where both confirm their consent and the decree is passed, cannot be moved earlier than six months or later than eighteen months after the first motion was presented.
That six-month gap is what people call the cooling off period. Parliament put it there so that a decision made in anger could be reconsidered, and so that couples who might reconcile had time to do so. For many couples it serves that purpose. For others, who have lived apart for years, settled every rupee and moved on with their lives, it is six months of waiting for a formality.
In Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017) the Supreme Court held that the six-month period is directory, not mandatory. The family court has discretion to waive it where the purpose of the cooling off period has already been served and waiting would serve no purpose. Before 2017, couples in this position often had to take the matter to the Supreme Court itself; now the family court can decide it.
The provisions that matter
Section 13B, Hindu Marriage Act 1955
Section 13B(1) allows a joint petition for divorce by mutual consent where the spouses have been living separately for one year or more, have not been able to live together, and have agreed to dissolve the marriage. Section 13B(2) says the court shall pass the decree on a motion of both parties made not earlier than six months and not later than eighteen months after the petition was presented, if the petition has not been withdrawn and the court is satisfied after hearing the parties.
Section 14, Hindu Marriage Act 1955
No divorce petition can be presented within one year of the marriage, unless the court gives leave on the ground of exceptional hardship to the petitioner or exceptional depravity on the part of the respondent. This proviso is what the Delhi High Court has used to allow waiver of the one-year separation for a mutual consent petition in exceptional cases.
Section 28, Special Marriage Act 1954 and other personal laws
Couples married under the Special Marriage Act, including interfaith couples, have a parallel mutual consent provision in Section 28, with the same one-year separation and a second motion between six and eighteen months later. Courts have applied the Amardeep Singh reasoning to it. Christian couples file under Section 10A of the Divorce Act 1869, which requires two years of separation; check the current position on waiver under that Act before filing.
Article 142, Constitution of India
In Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan (2023) the Supreme Court held that it can, under Article 142, waive the waiting period and dissolve a marriage, including on irretrievable breakdown. Only the Supreme Court has this power; a family court or the High Court decides waiver within Section 13B itself. Our guide on whether the Delhi High Court can grant divorce on irretrievable breakdown explains that limit.
The Amardeep Singh test: what the court checks before it waives six months
- The separation has already lasted long enough. Amardeep Singh referred to the six months under Section 13B(2), in addition to the one year under Section 13B(1), being over before the first motion itself, that is, about eighteen months of separation by then. Courts have since applied this with some flexibility, as the next sections explain.
- Every attempt at reconciliation has failed. Mediation or conciliation, including efforts under Section 23(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 9 of the Family Courts Act and Order 32A of the CPC, has been tried and there is no likelihood of success.
- The parties have genuinely settled their differences. This includes alimony, custody of any child and any other pending issues between them.
- Waiting would only prolong the agony. The court must be satisfied that six more months would serve no purpose except to keep two people in a dead marriage.
- The application gives reasons. Amardeep Singh said the waiver application can be filed one week after the first motion, and the court should decide it on the facts, using video conferencing where a party cannot appear.
Is the eighteen-month condition applied strictly?
Read literally, the first Amardeep Singh factor would allow waiver only where the couple had been separated for eighteen months before the first motion. Family courts in Delhi initially read it that way, and some still look closely at the separation period. But the Supreme Court described its own conditions as considerations, and later decisions have treated them as guidance for the court's discretion rather than a rigid checklist.
The question that came up in Delhi was sharper: what if the couple has not even lived apart for a full year? In December 2025 a Full Bench of the Delhi High Court (ABC v. XYZ, 2025:DHC:11467-FB) answered it. The court held that the one-year separation requirement in Section 13B(1) can be waived by applying the proviso to Section 14(1), in cases of exceptional hardship or exceptional depravity, and not merely for the asking. It also held that waiving the one year does not prevent waiver of the six months; each is considered on its own, and where both are waived, the decree can take effect immediately.
In practical terms, this means a couple whose marriage broke down within months, with a clear settlement and a real reason not to wait, can now ask the family court to waive both periods. They will need to show exceptional hardship, not just impatience, and the court will want to be sure the consent of both is free and considered. For couples separated for two or three years, the eighteen-month point is rarely the problem; the quality of the settlement is.
How the waiver works in a Delhi family court, step by step
This is the usual sequence. Individual family court judges vary in what they ask for, so be ready to answer questions in person.
Finalise the settlement
Agree every term in writing: the total alimony and how it is paid, custody and visitation, return of streedhan and articles, and what happens to every pending case. A mediated settlement through a court mediation centre carries the most weight, but a carefully drafted private settlement can also work.
Choose the right family court
Under Section 19 of the Hindu Marriage Act, the petition can be filed where the marriage was solemnised, where the couple last lived together, or where the respondent lives. For Delhi, that means the family court for the relevant district, at complexes such as Tis Hazari, Saket, Karkardooma, Rohini or Dwarka.
File the joint first motion petition
Both spouses sign the petition and supporting affidavits. It sets out the marriage, the date of separation, the failed attempts at reconciliation and the settlement terms. Both appear before the court, which records their statements. Payments due at the first motion stage are usually made here, often by demand draft.
File the waiver application
After at least a week, file an application to waive the six-month period, with an affidavit explaining why each Amardeep Singh factor is met: the length of separation, the failed mediation, the full settlement and the specific hardship that waiting would cause. Attach the settlement and any proof of hardship, such as a job offer abroad.
Appear for the waiver hearing
The court may want to speak to both spouses, sometimes separately, to check that consent is free and that nobody is being pressured. A spouse abroad can usually appear by video conference with the court's permission.
Second motion and decree
If the court allows waiver, the second motion is recorded, often on the same day or within a short period, and the decree of divorce is passed. Remaining payments are made at this stage as the settlement provides. Apply for a certified copy of the decree straight away.
If any criminal case is part of the settlement, such as a cruelty FIR, the decree is usually followed by a quashing petition in the High Court. Plan that step at the same time, not after the divorce.
Time and cost, with and without waiver
| Stage | Typical time | Court fee (general) |
|---|---|---|
| Drafting the settlement and joint petition | 1 to 4 weeks, depending on negotiation | None |
| First motion recorded | On filing or within 1 to 3 weeks | Nominal court fee on the petition; check the current amount |
| Waiver application filed | At least 1 week after the first motion | Nominal |
| Decision on the waiver application | Usually 2 to 8 weeks in Delhi family courts | None |
| Second motion and decree, if waiver granted | Same day as the waiver order or within a few weeks | None |
| Second motion without waiver | 6 to 18 months after the first motion, as the law provides | None |
| Certified copy of the decree | A few days to a few weeks | Copying charges |
| Quashing of a related FIR in the High Court, if any | 1 to 4 months after the decree in most settled matters | Court fee as per current schedule |
What makes a waiver application succeed or fail
Family courts grant waiver most readily where three things are visible on the file: a long, undisputed separation; a written, complete settlement with the first instalment already paid; and a concrete reason the waiting hurts, such as a job abroad, a remarriage that is already fixed, an elderly parent who needs care in another city, or a child caught in uncertainty. An application that just says both parties want it done quickly is weaker.
Applications fail for predictable reasons. The settlement leaves something open, such as custody of a child to be decided later. One spouse appears hesitant when the judge speaks to them. The separation is recent and no exceptional hardship is shown. Or the court senses that one side, often the wife, is being rushed into a settlement she does not fully understand. Judges are protective in that situation, and rightly so.
When Advocate B.K. Singh drafts a waiver application, he writes the hardship paragraph around documents, not adjectives. A visa appointment letter, an employer's joining date or a medical record speaks for itself. He also makes sure the settlement records exactly when each instalment is paid, so that the court can see the first payment has already been made before it is asked to waive anything.
Courts also look at the children. If there is a child, the settlement must deal with custody, visitation, schooling and maintenance in enough detail that the court is confident the child's interests have been thought through. A clause saying custody will be decided mutually is an invitation to refuse waiver.
Documents to have ready for the waiver application
- Marriage certificate, or wedding card and photographs if the marriage was not registered
- Proof of separate residence since the date of separation, such as rent agreements, utility bills or employer letters
- The signed settlement agreement, preferably the mediated settlement from a court mediation centre
- Proof of the first instalment paid, such as a copy of the demand draft or bank transfer
- Details of every pending case between the parties, with court and case numbers
- Documents showing the hardship of waiting: job offer, visa papers, medical records, remarriage details
- Identity proof and recent photographs of both spouses
- For a spouse abroad: passport copy, address abroad, and a power of attorney if a relative will handle paperwork
- Custody and visitation schedule, if there are children, with the child's school details
Pending criminal cases and the order of steps
Many mutual consent divorces in Delhi come after a cruelty FIR under Sections 85 and 86 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (old Section 498A IPC), a Domestic Violence Act case and a maintenance claim. The settlement should list each case and what will happen to it. The FIR cannot be closed by the wife withdrawing it before the magistrate; it has to be quashed by the High Court once the settlement is in place. Our guide on whether a 498A case can be quashed after divorce or settlement covers that step.
The usual sequence ties payments to stages: an instalment at the first motion, another at the second motion, and the balance when the High Court quashes the FIR. A waiver of the six months speeds up the middle stage, which means the quashing petition can often be filed within weeks of the first motion rather than months. That shortens the whole process considerably.
Be careful with sequencing. If the husband's side insists on quashing first and the wife insists on the decree first, the deal can stall. A clear written schedule, agreed before the first motion, avoids that. The Delhi High Court has also directed that mediated settlements be drafted precisely, preferably in Hindi as well as English where feasible, naming every case and every party, so that nobody can later say they did not understand what they signed.
A made-up example: an engineer leaving for Canada
Here's a made-up example. Rohit and Neha married in 2021 and separated in early 2024, when Neha moved back to her parents' home in Rohini. A cruelty FIR and a maintenance case followed. In mid-2025, after several sessions at the mediation centre, they settled: a lump sum alimony paid in three parts, return of jewellery, and closure of all cases.
They filed the first motion in the family court at Rohini in March 2026, with the first instalment paid by demand draft. Rohit had a job offer in Toronto with a joining date in June. A week after the first motion, they filed a waiver application, attaching the mediated settlement, proof of the first payment, Rohit's offer letter and evidence that they had lived apart for over two years.
The family court spoke to both of them, satisfied itself that Neha's consent was her own and that nothing was left open, and waived the six-month period about five weeks after the first motion. The decree was passed the same day, the second instalment was paid, and the quashing petition was filed in the Delhi High Court the following week. All names and dates are invented; a real court decides on its own view of the facts.
If the family court refuses to waive
A refusal is not the end. The first motion remains on record, so the simplest option is often to wait for the six months to run and then move the second motion. If the refusal was because something specific was missing, such as a detailed custody arrangement or proof of separation, you can cure the gap and file a fresh waiver application with better material.
If the refusal is plainly wrong, for example the court treated the six months as mandatory or ignored a settlement and long separation clearly on record, the order can be challenged in the Delhi High Court. Because a waiver order does not finally decide the divorce, the usual route is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, which lets the High Court correct a subordinate court that has failed to exercise its jurisdiction properly. Where a family court order finally decides rights, the route is an appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act within 30 days; our page on appeals against family court orders in the Delhi High Court explains that procedure.
In practice, a High Court challenge is worth it only where the time saved matters. By the time an Article 227 petition is heard and decided, a good part of the six months may have passed. If both spouses are cooperative, a fresh, better-documented waiver application in the family court is usually quicker.
There is also the High Court's own role in appeals. Where a contested divorce is already in appeal before a Division Bench and the parties settle, the Bench has in suitable cases recorded the settlement and passed a mutual consent decree, or sent the parties to the family court with directions to decide quickly. Our page on family court appeals covers how settlements during an appeal are handled.
Withdrawing consent before the second motion
A mutual consent divorce needs mutual consent at both stages. In Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash (1991) the Supreme Court held that either spouse can withdraw consent before the decree is passed, and the court cannot then grant the divorce under Section 13B. This is one reason waiver attracts people: it shortens the window in which one side can change their mind.
But a party who withdraws after taking money or giving undertakings to the court is not free of consequences. Undertakings recorded in a court order can be enforced, and courts have treated deliberate breach of a court-recorded undertaking as contempt. Money paid under a settlement is usually refundable if the deal collapses. The settlement should say so in plain words.
If you are worried that your spouse may back out, the answer is not to rush the waiver but to structure the payments so that neither side gains by walking away halfway through. Advocate B.K. Singh also has couples write into the settlement what they will do if the family court refuses waiver: wait out the six months on the same terms, or reapply within a fixed time. That one clause stops a refused application from turning into a renegotiation of the whole deal.
NRI spouses and appearance by video
Amardeep Singh expressly allowed the family court to use video conferencing where a party cannot appear, and to allow representation through close relatives such as parents or siblings where needed, provided the court is satisfied about identity and consent. Delhi family courts now routinely allow a spouse abroad to join by video for the motions and the waiver hearing, though the first appearance in person is still sometimes asked for.
For an NRI, the waiver can make the difference between one trip and two, or between no trip and one. Prepare a power of attorney for the paperwork, keep your passport and visa copies ready for identity, and confirm with the court in advance what technology and timing it uses. Our guide on how NRIs can handle divorce cases in Delhi without travelling explains these arrangements in more detail.
Common mistakes that cost couples the waiver
- Filing before the settlement is final. A first motion with open issues makes waiver unlikely and wastes a hearing.
- Vague hardship. Wanting to move on is understandable, but courts respond to documents showing concrete harm from waiting.
- Leaving criminal cases out of the settlement. A divorce that does not deal with the FIR invites fresh disputes later.
- Wrong court. A petition filed where neither Section 19 ground applies can be returned, and the clock starts again.
- One spouse unprepared for the judge's questions. Hesitation or contradictions about the settlement can end the waiver request on the spot.
- No plan if waiver is refused. Agree in advance whether you will wait out the six months or reapply, so the settlement does not unravel.
What to do this week
Write down every term of your settlement and every case pending between you, with case numbers. If you have not been through mediation, consider the court mediation centre; a mediated settlement carries weight at the waiver stage. Collect proof of the date you started living separately and of any hardship that waiting would cause.
If the first motion is already recorded, check the date: the waiver application can go in one week later. If the family court has refused waiver, decide quickly between a fresh application and a High Court challenge, and read our page on transferring a matrimonial case if the case is in a city neither of you can easily reach. For a related question, see our guide on whether a divorce decree can be appealed.
For advice on your settlement and waiver papers, or for updates on how Delhi courts are applying the waiting period, you can contact Advocate B.K. Singh.
Frequently asked questions
Can we get a mutual divorce in one month in Delhi?
Sometimes, if the family court waives the six-month period soon after the first motion. It depends on the court's satisfaction that everything is settled and waiting serves no purpose. Plan for one to three months as a realistic best case, not a promise.
Who decides the waiver application?
The family court where the mutual consent petition is pending decides it. You do not need to go to the High Court or Supreme Court for a waiver under Section 13B(2). The High Court comes in only if the family court's order is challenged.
Can the six-month period be waived if we have a child?
Yes, a child does not bar waiver. But the court will look closely at the custody, visitation and maintenance arrangements before agreeing. Vague clauses about the child are a common reason for refusal.
Can we file for mutual divorce within one year of marriage?
Only with the court's leave on the ground of exceptional hardship or exceptional depravity under Section 14. The Delhi High Court's Full Bench confirmed in December 2025 that the one-year separation can be waived in such cases. It is not granted merely because both want it.
What if my spouse refuses to appear for the second motion?
The court cannot pass a mutual consent decree without both spouses confirming consent. If one side withdraws, the petition fails, and the remaining remedy is a contested divorce on a ground under Section 13. Undertakings given to the court and money paid may have consequences under the settlement.
Does the waiver application need a separate affidavit?
Yes, it is usually supported by an affidavit of both spouses explaining why the Amardeep Singh factors are met. Documents showing separation, the settlement and the hardship of waiting should be attached. Family courts vary slightly in format, so check local practice.
Is the cooling off period the same under the Special Marriage Act?
Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act has the same one-year separation and six-to-eighteen-month window. Courts have applied the Amardeep Singh reasoning to it as well. The waiver application works in the same way.
Can the Supreme Court grant divorce without waiting?
Yes, under Article 142 the Supreme Court can waive the period and dissolve the marriage, as Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan (2023) confirmed. This usually happens when a case is already before it, such as a transfer petition. Family courts and High Courts do not have that power.
