
In short. A Section 9 arbitration petition asks a court for urgent interim protection, such as an injunction, a deposit or security, or preservation of goods, while a dispute is headed for arbitration or is being arbitrated. It can be filed before the arbitration starts, during it, or after the award until it is enforced. In Delhi, urgent petitions are often heard within days and an interim order can be passed at the first hearing. If the other side is moving assets or invoking a guarantee, act this week.
Is this your situation?
- Your contract has an arbitration clause, and the other side is about to sell, move or hide the assets you will need to recover your money.
- A buyer or employer has threatened to invoke the bank guarantee you furnished, and you think the invocation is unjustified.
- Your machinery, goods or documents are locked at the other side's premises after the contract was terminated.
- A former partner or franchisee is still using your brand, data or premises in breach of the agreement.
- The arbitrator has not yet been appointed and you need protection now.
- You have won an award, and the losing party is moving money before you can enforce it.
- You have received a Section 9 petition against your company and an ex parte order, and need to know how to respond.
Key points
- Section 9 gives court-ordered protection, not a decision on the dispute. The court keeps things in place so that the arbitration is not rendered pointless.
- You can file before the arbitration starts. But if the court grants relief at that stage, arbitral proceedings must begin within 90 days or the time the court allows.
- Once the tribunal is in place, go to the tribunal first. The court will entertain a fresh Section 9 petition only if the tribunal's remedy under Section 17 would not be effective.
- The court of the seat hears it. In Delhi, the Commercial Division of the High Court hears petitions in larger domestic and all international commercial arbitrations; smaller ones go to the district commercial courts.
- Evidence wins Section 9 cases. Show a real claim, real urgency and real risk, with documents, not adjectives.
What is a Section 9 arbitration petition?
Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 lets a party to an arbitration agreement ask a court for interim measures of protection. The court can preserve or sell perishable goods that are the subject of the dispute, secure the amount in dispute, order detention, preservation or inspection of property, grant an interim injunction, appoint a receiver, or make any other interim order it considers just and convenient. It can also appoint a guardian for a minor or a person of unsound mind for the purposes of the arbitration.
A Section 9 arbitration petition does not decide who is right. It protects the subject matter until the arbitral tribunal decides. If a buyer owes Rs 5 crore and is about to sell its only factory, an award two years later is worth little. A court order today that the factory not be sold, or that Rs 5 crore be secured, keeps the award meaningful.
The power is wide but used carefully. Courts apply the familiar tests for interim relief: a prima facie case, a balance of convenience in the applicant's favour, and irreparable harm if relief is refused. For orders securing money, they also look for real evidence that the other side is trying to defeat a future award. Arbitration is meant to keep courts out of the merits, so the court decides only as much as it needs to protect the process.
Our service page on arbitration petitions in the Delhi High Court covers Sections 9, 11 and 34 together. This guide goes deeper into Section 9: when it fits, how to file, and what the court will expect from you.
The provisions you need to know
Section 9(1)
A party may apply to the court before or during arbitral proceedings, or at any time after the award but before it is enforced under Section 36, for the interim measures listed in the section. The court has the same power to make orders as it has in any proceeding before it.
Section 9(2)
Where the court passes an interim measure before arbitral proceedings begin, the proceedings must commence within 90 days from the date of the order, or within any further time the court allows.
Section 9(3)
Once the arbitral tribunal has been constituted, the court shall not entertain a Section 9 application unless it finds that circumstances exist which may not make the remedy under Section 17 efficacious.
Section 17
The arbitral tribunal can itself grant the same kinds of interim measures during the proceedings. Its orders are enforceable under the Code of Civil Procedure in the same manner as an order of the court.
Section 2(2), proviso
Section 9 also applies to international commercial arbitrations seated outside India, unless the parties have agreed otherwise. A party in a Singapore-seated arbitration can therefore ask an Indian court to freeze assets in India.
Sections 21, 37 and 42
Section 21: arbitral proceedings commence on the date the respondent receives the request to refer the dispute to arbitration. Section 37(1)(b): an order granting or refusing a Section 9 measure is appealable. Section 42: once an application is made to a court, later applications arising from that agreement go to the same court.
When to file: before, during or after the arbitration
Before the arbitration starts, Section 9 is often the only remedy available, because there is no tribunal yet. The Supreme Court held in Sundaram Finance v. NEPC India (1999) that a petition can be filed even before a notice invoking arbitration is sent, provided the applicant has a clear intention to arbitrate. In practice, it is safer to send the Section 21 notice invoking arbitration at the same time or shortly before filing. If the court grants relief, Section 9(2) requires the arbitration to begin within 90 days, and a party that does nothing within that time risks losing the order.
During the arbitration, Section 9(3) sends you to the tribunal under Section 17 first. The court will step in only if the tribunal's remedy would not be effective: for example, where the tribunal is not available urgently, where relief is needed against a third party the tribunal cannot bind, or where the matter is so urgent that waiting would defeat it. The Supreme Court held in Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India v. Essar Bulk Terminal (2021) that if the court had already taken up and considered the petition before the tribunal was constituted, it can go on to decide it.
After the award, Section 9 remains available until the award is enforced. An award holder worried that the losing party will strip its accounts while a Section 34 challenge is pending can ask for security under Section 9. Our guide on enforcing an arbitral award in Delhi explains how this fits with execution.
Many institutional rules, including those of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, provide for an emergency arbitrator who can grant urgent relief before the tribunal is formed. In Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings v. Future Retail (2021), the Supreme Court held that an emergency arbitrator's order in an India-seated arbitration is enforceable as an order under Section 17. Where the rules allow it, an emergency arbitrator can be an alternative to court.
Section 9 in Delhi: which court hears the petition
The petition goes to the 'court' defined in Section 2(1)(e) of the Act. For a domestic arbitration this is the principal civil court of original jurisdiction, which includes a High Court that has original civil jurisdiction, as the Delhi High Court does. For an international commercial arbitration, only the High Court can hear it. Following BGS SGS Soma JV v. NHPC (2019), the court at the seat of the arbitration has exclusive jurisdiction; if the seat is New Delhi, a Section 9 petition in Delhi is the right course even if the property is elsewhere.
Within Delhi, the Commercial Courts Act decides the bench. If the dispute is commercial and its value is above Rs 2 crore at present (a proposal to raise that limit is pending, so check the current figure), or the arbitration is international, the petition goes to the Commercial Division of the High Court and is registered as an O.M.P.(I)(COMM.). Smaller commercial disputes go to the District Judge (Commercial) at the relevant district court. Our guide on which cases go to the Commercial Division explains how value is counted.
Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, which requires pre-institution mediation before most commercial suits, applies to suits, not to arbitration petitions. You do not need to mediate before filing a Section 9 petition.
Because of Section 42, the court in which you file your first petition becomes the court for later applications, including the Section 34 challenge. Choose carefully. This is a private law firm's website; for official case status and cause lists, use the Delhi High Court's own website.
Interim measures in arbitration: what courts commonly grant
| What you need | Typical Section 9 order | What the court looks for |
|---|---|---|
| Stop sale or transfer of assets | Injunction restraining sale, transfer or encumbrance of named property | A credible claim and evidence of an attempt to dispose of assets |
| Secure a money claim | Deposit in court, bank guarantee or attachment of specified property | Strong prima facie claim and real risk of the award being defeated |
| Stop a bank guarantee invocation | Restraint on invocation or encashment | Egregious fraud or irretrievable injustice; otherwise usually refused |
| Recover goods, machinery or documents | Release, inspection or preservation order; local commissioner to make an inventory | Ownership or right to possession and harm from continued detention |
| Stop use of brand, data or confidential information | Injunction enforcing negative covenants of the contract | Valid covenant, breach and harm that money cannot repair |
| Protect a running business or project | Receiver or status quo order | Serious mismanagement or risk to the subject matter |
Securing money and bank guarantees: the hardest Section 9 cases
Most Section 9 petitions in Delhi are about money: a supplier or contractor wants the amount it claims secured before the arbitration. Courts are careful here, because an order to deposit Rs 3 crore is a heavy burden on a party who has not been found liable. The Supreme Court in Essar House v. Arcellor Mittal Nippon Steel India (2022) held that the court is not strictly bound by the technical rules of the Code of Civil Procedure, such as Order 38 Rule 5 on attachment before judgment, but the principles behind those rules guide its discretion. In plain terms: show a strong claim and real material that the other side may defeat the award.
Good evidence includes sale advertisements for the respondent's property, a sudden transfer of assets to related companies, charges created on its assets recently registered with the Registrar of Companies, a closure of its business premises, or admissions of liability in emails followed by a refusal to pay. A respondent that has simply disputed the claim, and has a running business, is rarely asked to deposit the full amount.
Bank guarantees are a separate category. An unconditional bank guarantee is an independent promise by the bank, and courts restrain its invocation only in narrow cases: egregious fraud of which the bank has notice, or special equities causing irretrievable injustice. This is a long-settled Supreme Court line, including U.P. State Sugar Corporation v. Sumac International (1997). Disputes about whether the contractor actually defaulted are usually left to the arbitration. Conditional guarantees, which can be invoked only on a stated event, are examined more closely against their own terms.
When Advocate B.K. Singh is asked to stop an invocation, the first thing he reads is the guarantee itself, before the contract. If the wording is unconditional, he tells the client frankly that the chances are limited and looks for fraud or a breach of the guarantee's own conditions before advising a petition.
How to file a Section 9 petition in Delhi, step by step
Confirm the arbitration clause and the seat
Read the clause for the seat, the governing law and any exclusion of Section 9. The seat decides which court hears you; a clause naming 'venue' only needs careful reading.
Send the notice invoking arbitration
Serve a notice under Section 21 setting out the claim and asking for reference to arbitration. This shows intention to arbitrate and starts the clock for the arbitration itself.
Collect the urgency evidence
Gather the documents that show why you cannot wait: sale advertisements, ROC filings, invocation letters, photographs of locked goods, emails. Without these, the petition is a claim, not an emergency.
Draft the petition and affidavit
Set out the contract, the dispute, the prima facie case, the balance of convenience and the irreparable harm. Specify exactly what you want: which property, which account, what amount. Vague prayers get vague orders.
Check for a caveat and serve an advance copy
If the respondent has filed a caveat under Section 148A CPC, it must be served before the petition is heard. Our guide on caveats in the Delhi High Court explains how this works. Ex parte relief is possible only where notice would defeat the purpose.
File and seek urgent listing
File through e-filing with the court fee and an urgency application. Genuinely urgent Section 9 petitions are often listed the same day or the next working day.
First hearing and ad interim order
The court may grant an ad interim order, issue notice, or appoint a local commissioner to inventory goods. Comply with any condition, such as furnishing an undertaking or security, by the deadline.
Replies, hearing and final order
The respondent files a reply, you file a rejoinder, and the court hears the petition and passes a final Section 9 order. Then make sure the arbitration begins within the 90-day period if it has not already.
Time and cost at each stage
| Stage | Typical time | Court fee and costs (general) |
|---|---|---|
| Preparing the petition | 2 to 10 days | Document copies and affidavits |
| Urgent listing and first hearing | Same day to 1 week | Fixed court fee on the petition; check the current schedule |
| Local commissioner, if appointed | 1 to 3 weeks | Commissioner's fee as fixed by the court, usually paid by the applicant |
| Replies and final hearing | 1 to 6 months | Nominal fee on applications |
| Commencing arbitration after a pre-arbitral order | Within 90 days or as allowed | Arbitrator's or institution's fees as per the agreement or schedule |
| Appeal under Section 37 | Filed within 60 days; decided in 3 months to 1 year | Court fee on appeal; check the current rate |
Documents for a Section 9 petition
The contract
- The agreement containing the arbitration clause, with all amendments
- Purchase orders, work orders, invoices and delivery challans
- Bank guarantee, if any, with its exact wording
- Termination or invocation letters
The claim
- Statement of account and ledger showing the amount due
- Emails or minutes admitting liability
- Notice invoking arbitration and proof of its delivery
- Earlier legal notices and replies
The urgency
- Sale advertisements, ROC charge filings or MCA master data of the respondent
- Photographs and inventories of goods or machinery held by the other side
- Evidence of transfers to related parties
- Board resolution or authority letter for the person signing the petition
A made-up example: machinery locked at a site in Bawana
Here's a made-up example. A Gurugram contractor agreed to build a warehouse in Bawana for a logistics company. The contract had an arbitration clause with New Delhi as the seat. After a dispute over delayed payments of Rs 2.6 crore, the logistics company terminated the contract, locked the site, and kept the contractor's two cranes, a batching plant and the site office inside. It then wrote that it would 'adjust' the equipment against its own claims for delay.
The contractor sent a notice invoking arbitration the same day and filed a Section 9 petition in the Commercial Division of the Delhi High Court. It annexed the contract, the equipment purchase invoices, photographs of the locked site, the termination letter and the 'adjustment' letter. It asked for release of the equipment and, in the alternative, preservation and an inventory.
At the first hearing the court appointed a local commissioner to visit the site, prepare an inventory and photograph the equipment, and restrained the logistics company from removing or using it. After replies, the court directed release of the cranes and plant on the contractor furnishing a bank guarantee for a part of the counterclaim, leaving the rest of the dispute to the arbitral tribunal. It refused the contractor's further request to secure its whole Rs 2.6 crore, finding no evidence that the logistics company was disposing of assets.
The contractor got its equipment back within weeks; the money claim went to arbitration.
What a judge wants to see at an urgent hearing
An urgent Section 9 hearing in the Delhi High Court may last ten minutes, sometimes less. The judge has read the synopsis and perhaps the prayer, and wants three answers quickly: what is the agreement, what is about to happen, and why money later will not be enough. A petition that buries those answers in forty pages of contract history loses the moment.
Put the urgency on the first page. A short list of dates and events, with the page number of each supporting document, lets the judge test your case in minutes. Draft the prayer as the order you want the court to sign: name the property by its address and khasra number, the bank account by branch, the goods by inventory, and the period of the restraint.
Be candid about weak points. If the respondent has paid part of the claim, or has raised a counterclaim, say so. Courts in Delhi regularly vacate ex parte orders where the applicant kept back a relevant fact, and the costs and loss of credibility follow the applicant into the arbitration.
Advocate B.K. Singh asks every client seeking urgent relief to be ready to offer something in return: an undertaking to pay damages if the order proves wrong, or security for the respondent's counterclaim. In his experience, a court that can see the applicant has skin in the game is far more willing to pass a firm order at the first hearing.
What usually goes wrong in Section 9 petitions
- Filing in the wrong court. A petition in the court where the respondent's office is, when the seat is elsewhere, is likely to be returned.
- Asking for the whole claim to be deposited without evidence of risk. Courts do not treat Section 9 as a shortcut to a money decree.
- Forgetting the 90 days. After a pre-arbitral order, the arbitration must actually begin. Parties that relax after the order risk losing it.
- Going to court when the tribunal is in place. Without a reason why Section 17 would not work, the court will send you back to the tribunal.
- Concealing facts at the ex parte stage. An ex parte order obtained without disclosing a relevant letter or payment is vacated, often with costs.
- Vague prayers. An order restraining 'the respondent's assets' is hard to enforce. Name the property, the account, the goods.
If you are the respondent to a Section 9 petition
If you receive an ex parte order, read it the same day and comply. Disobeying an interim order, even one you think is wrong, exposes the company and its directors to contempt and weakens your defence. Then file a reply and, if needed, an application to vacate the order, pointing out anything the petitioner left out.
Your strongest points are usually these: the claim is seriously disputed, your business is running and solvent, there is no evidence of dissipation, the bank guarantee is unconditional and there is no fraud, or the tribunal is already constituted and the petitioner should have gone there. Offering limited security voluntarily, for instance a charge on a specific property, can avoid a much heavier deposit order.
If you expect a petition, for example after sending a termination letter or invoking a guarantee, consider filing a caveat in the Delhi High Court so that no ex parte order is passed without notice to you.
Appeals and what happens next
An order granting or refusing a Section 9 measure is appealable under Section 37(1)(b). In a commercial matter the appeal goes to the Commercial Appellate Division within 60 days under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act. Our page on commercial appeals in the Delhi High Court covers that process. Appeal courts are slow to disturb a discretionary interim order unless it is plainly wrong.
A Section 9 order is not permanent. It usually lasts until the tribunal is constituted and can be revisited by the tribunal under Section 17, or until a set date. Our guide on how interim orders work and how long they last explains this in more general terms.
Once protection is in place, the main work is the arbitration itself. If the other side will not agree on an arbitrator, see our guide on getting an arbitrator appointed under Section 11. For detailed material on arbitration practice across India, our network's site at arbitrationlawyer.in covers arbitration beyond the Delhi High Court.
Section 9 for foreign-seated arbitrations and NRI parties
Since the 2015 amendment, a party to an arbitration seated in Singapore, London or Dubai can seek interim relief from an Indian court against assets in India, unless the agreement excludes it. Such petitions in Delhi go to the High Court. The court will look at whether the relief is needed in India, and whether the foreign tribunal or an emergency arbitrator could give effective relief.
Foreign parties and NRIs can authorise someone in India to sign and file through a board resolution or a power of attorney, and can attend hearings by video. Originals of documents executed abroad may need notarisation and apostille or consular attestation, which takes time; start early if you anticipate a dispute.
What to do this week
Find the arbitration clause and note the seat. Collect the evidence that shows urgency: what is being sold, moved or invoked, and when. Send a notice invoking arbitration if you have not already. Prepare a one-page chronology with dates and amounts; it helps the court grasp the case at an urgent hearing.
Then decide whether the court or the tribunal is the right forum, and which court has jurisdiction. Our service page on Section 9, 11 and 34 petitions in the Delhi High Court sets out how we take these matters on.
If you want your papers reviewed or would like updates on the law of interim relief in arbitration, please contact Advocate B.K. Singh.
Frequently asked questions
Can I file a Section 9 petition without starting arbitration?
Yes, before arbitration begins, but you must show an intention to arbitrate. If the court grants relief, arbitral proceedings must begin within 90 days or within the time the court allows.
Can the court order the other side to deposit the full amount I claim?
It can, but rarely does without strong evidence that the other side is trying to defeat the future award. Courts usually ask for a strong prima facie case and real material showing risk.
Can a Section 9 petition stop a bank guarantee from being encashed?
Only in narrow cases: egregious fraud known to the bank, or special circumstances causing irretrievable injustice. Disputes about whether you defaulted under the contract are usually left to the arbitrator.
Do I need pre-institution mediation before a Section 9 petition?
No. Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act applies to commercial suits, not to petitions under the Arbitration Act.
Can I get relief without the other side being heard?
Yes, an ex parte ad interim order can be passed if giving notice would defeat the purpose. But if the other side has filed a caveat, it must be served first, and full disclosure is expected.
What is the difference between Section 9 and Section 17?
Section 9 relief is given by the court, Section 17 relief by the arbitral tribunal. Once the tribunal is constituted, you are expected to go to the tribunal unless its remedy would not be effective.
Is a Section 9 order appealable?
Yes, under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration Act. In commercial matters the appeal must be filed within 60 days before the Commercial Appellate Division.
Can I file Section 9 in Delhi if the seat is Mumbai?
Generally no. The court at the seat has exclusive jurisdiction for petitions under the Act. If the seat is Mumbai, the Section 9 petition goes to the competent court there.
